11 Comments
User's avatar
Stephanie Sweeney's avatar

I like how we’re picking up on the theme of wealth as an impediment to “goodness”/moral character, and its converse; how wealth can be used for good, to do good, and thereby be redemptive for the wealthy — like you explored in “Departures”

Ben Wakeman's avatar

Thanks, Stephanie. Well now I just feel like a piano with one note! I’m hopelessly drawn to this theme lately. Next book I’ll have to shake things up.

Stephanie Sweeney's avatar

It was meant complimentarily! I think many writers are drawn to certain themes throughout their body of work, coming at them from different angles, trying to understand or say something deeper. Anyway that particular theme is complex and relevant in a time of rampant and escalating wealth inequity...

Julie Gabrielli's avatar

These are such insightful observations, Stephanie. Your notes helped me to appreciate this all the more.

Stephanie Sweeney's avatar

Oh good!

Holly Starley's avatar

The plot thickens. I love love this turn—the worst paintings as the best really. ♥️

Ben Wakeman's avatar

Agreed, here’s to bad paintings! Thanks for reading, Holly.

Julie Gabrielli's avatar

I felt a redemptive tone here — both for Hasselblad and for Marabelle (and her mother, too). An artist’s vision, trusting her muse, brought the invisible unhoused to visibility. Loss softened Hasselblad’s heart and gave him that same vision. Art as a lens to see the humanity in everyone. Beautiful, Ben.

Ben Wakeman's avatar

Thank you, Julie. I’m glad this one landed.

Rose Campbell's avatar

This episode is especially touching!

Ben Wakeman's avatar

Thank you, Rose. 🙏